Tuesday, December 8, 2009

deep deep deep in an underground vault with no walls: a short essay on essays


figure 1. extending boundaries to enable depth

alack, alack!
the hail earlier today hit my face sharply, a welcome relief from the nebulous cloud of nonsense (see fig.2) that i breathe in when i try hard to focus on the cloud without thinking about its units of nonsense. (but what is a unit of nonsense? and would not the cloud bring me greater nourishment than a tiny unit thereof?)


figure 2. the possibility of borders


fuck time, i will refuse to disintegrate and somehow forge forward.


figure 3. a question of borders

it is hard to remember to take pleasure
in contradictions
when they begin
to melt
all over
my
glasses

figure 4. on the edge of concern, there is just one more thing

enough, i say! enough!
i demand more!
it's too much! do you really need to--
totally overlooked.


figure 5. the desire to draw boundaries induces dilemma

now is the time.
(how can the time be now? i'm not ready yet!)
the world is as it is because it is as it should be and
all is how it should be because it is how it is
(***reference proof for "why giraffes go up in lifts," car cemetery 12(4):2009)

figure 6. the recent discovery of additional dimensions to the problem has dire implications for the accessibility of shimmering intergalactic portals to contemporary youth culture

and of all possibilities
we are left with the comfort that:
all things are possible
which we can conceive of as possible!

figure 7. a statistical abnormality suggests the need for new methods of analysis



comment!, e.g. with your favorite little screenshot of brain2.0?
(these invisible mediators, these quiet prompts)

1 comment:

  1. transcen(dance) will come whether or not we see or say.
    whither the weather? unstick the day.
    overarching triumphs try to [play? bray?]
    but tend to walk in pigsuits under shining cheese in the dead of night.

    There are no two ways about it! every time you refuse to reuse, wicked candles burn; "you lose!"
    (and every time you cautiously care, the wax particulates; choking air.)

    How is it
    that
    in a twist of mammary proportions
    Probabilistic models
    offer us more hope
    than mothers' breasts?

    ReplyDelete